gx1327 says:
as for the vinyl vs. "digital" sound argument, it's all in your head. the problem is that the .mp3 format is a COMPRESSED format, meaning that it reduces file size by making some parts of the song redundant. i am perfectly happy with 128 kbps .mp3 files. i cannot tell the difference. However, some audio snobs trade in 356 kbps and higher .mp3s, some even use what's called FLAC audio which is a lossless audio copy. the truth is, you can fit more audio information into a digital file because you are only limited by the file size. on a vinyl disc you are limited by the format -- how much can the head read, how much can you fit on a disc?
I can dig parts of what your saying BUT vinyl does have far better bass response than CD ... I know that’s a contentious argument, even now with CDs getting better treatment (we used to just toss the tape onto CD) than previously.
I do enjoy my CDs and, Failing that Flac and MUST use MP3 for such stuff as will be sold via ITunes and the like.
BUT
My 'side trade' to Git-Teaching (lol, i say "side" do to being pushed out by many 'in-housers') for year is/was Mastering CDs for Sony/JVC(Japan), Moonjune(Germany) and other labels from huge to tiny .. Mainly Jazz stuff such as a Tribute To Jaco(Pastorius) and Soft Machine(Holdsworth et-al) Live and such. Its getting damned hard to find a Mastering job that wont make me compromise my integrity as a music lover (cause, LOL! 10 years of "Mersh work"(Scoring) isn’t , lol, selling yer soul, is it?..oh yeah..it IS! LOL!)
The big push these days is "to be louder than that other song", via insane brick-wall limiting in post-post-production. I mean hell, the larger labels i deal/dealt with PRE-Brickwall their MIXes! No kidding! Its a SIN i say a SIN! ...Then they want it !!!LOUDER!!! Than LOUD! Effectively negating any chance of hearing Dynamic Range; Case in Point = That last Metallica CD .. Brick-Walled not once, not twice but yes...THREE times (Carl bangs head on the same wall he's screaming at) it’s maddening, but "The Loudness Wars" as we have dubbed them, are 'on' and I want no part of it.
gx1327 says:
maybe BUT, you also have to admit that as the technology progresses it becomes more tolerant. what i mean is that the first generation of CD players and CDs were very fickle. do you remember when you first held a CD? you were extra precious with it because heaven forbid you should marr the mirror-like, perfect finish on the recorded side of the disc. the slightest imperfection would lead to an unreadable CD.
Yes & No
Yes; the first player we got at ‘Music Isle’, (where I worked post ‘Jungle’, same folks) was a
Dennon. It was fickle as hell, side loading, and was abhorrently pricey back then in (guessing) 1985 or so, almost 3-grand if I recall.. That’d be over 5-grand today (whoa!)
BUT
No, the CDs were of wonderful indestructible quality (same ‘Thick went Thin’ timeline as LPs) back then—In fact we, and I’m guessing all, were visited by label-reps who would hold public In-Store “CD demonstrations” wherein they would allow the assembled skeptic audiophiles to do such things as take a key and scratch the surface or toss/skid the cd play-face down along the sidewalk outside and then play it. We had ditched the Dennon for either a Luxman or Nachamici or Sony(N.A.Philips) or something and these tortured CDs would play flawlessly. The “inside job” being pulled was that CIRCULAR or RADIAL scratches would skip (thus we avoided them) but anything not circular(which = a LOT) would. We did this many times back when CDs hung on the wall next to headphones and accessories… way back.
BUT these CDs where sturdy and made with the audiophile in mine *(and priced as such at 25 bucks each 1985)
Still, I can play my ancient Prestige Rec(JP) copy of (Miles Davis) ‘Bags Groove’ though it now resembles a scouring pad. Newer Cds? .. Ya look at ‘em wrong and they skip.
gx1327 says:
the differences can be 60 megs for an album, or 250 megs for an album, or 600 megs for an album. which one is going to sound better? well comparing vinyl to the 60 meg vesion and the 600 meg version might be completely different.
Definitely … and Virgin vinyl (as in the 60’s & early-70’s) is used to make these premium platters.
gx1327 says:
also you have to admit that most PCs are hooked up to less-than-worthy soundcards/speakers. a dell with a stock sound card and desktop speakers will certainly sound worse than what comes out of my computer which is a medium-grade audio card, plugged into a 5.1 receiver with 100w stereo speakers and an 8" sub
Yes home stereo has seemingly gone the way of the dinosaur – a PC playing music through crap will sound like crap 10 times outta 10, we agree on that 100% it seems
For Mastering work or ‘Critical Listening’ I use (Cross check not parallel) A Pair of Roland DS-90’s fed optically via either an Alesis Or M-Audio(depending) sound-card. I Cross Check these with an insanely pampered matched-pair of original Yamaha NS-10’s fed by a very quiet, yet warm Crown Tube Amp
Downstairs, for “casual listening” (or whatever ya call, lol, not mixing, etc), I use a pair of Paradigm’s and a Luxman Tube Amp.
My wife bought a 6.1 Onkyo thang that “goes with” (said , lol , the sales guy…UGH) the Flatscreen. 5.1, 6.1 whaterver .1 I don’t dig it at all, and I hate subwoofers(false bass lame crossovers etc) BUT I gotta admit its kay for a movie. I just cant understand (not saying this is YOU at all) anyone wanting to listen to anything purely musical in 5.1. Unless of course it was recorded and mixed that way. Still; 50’s Miles in 5.1 …LOL noooo thanks.
But yes, Folks buy to hear in their own environments etc. If all I had was a laptop I’d likely be a … no , wait, I wouldn’t.
And don’t get me started on IPods and Headphones (eeeek!) .. I have a 50 dollar Sandisc Flac player I take to the Gym every day but that’s it, lol, and that’s just so I don’t have to watch/hear Opera or Faux ‘news’ while I run or lift….
gx1327 says:
i am all for vinyl, i think it's cool, and i am thinking about buying one, but if you want to compare apples to apples digital audio will always be capable of "sounding better" because of the limitless space for audio information in the files
Well (24/48-96khz)DVD audio may come closest but, while I agree, in part, with what yer sayin’, and understand the angle (I think) yer takin’ Vinyl has a leg-up on digital due to a carved flow of imaged/carved sound waves that, while coming close enuff to remain unnoticed, 1’s and 0’s cannot reproduce.
But, at that stage its like ya said: “apples to apples”
Great points, all, gx1327 !
RAWK!
Cs
Global Disclaimer :
Carl Snow is an old, jaded & slightly bitter old man who cannot be held accountable for
anything, much less his opinionatedly opinionated opinions or those of his imaginary friends. We sincerely apologize if this Carl Snow and/or its behavior have infected you or others with its ugly brain and its juices.