Joined: 20 Sep 2009 United States Karma: 9
|
i used to be pretty good at saxophone. i was first chair and everything in high school and i NEVER practiced (aside from the hour or so i spent every day in class --- no extracurricular work).
the thing about it is that you basically HAVE to learn how to read music to play it. i was thinking about that this morning, actually when i had a dream that i bought a saxophone. weird, huh. basically the problem with all woodwind instruments (and brass instruments as well... probably all non-stringed instruments) is that you have to know more about music to play them.
with the guitar you can simply learn the distance between notes and replicate that "pattern" in any key with any set of notes without actually having to know the notes. i can play the major scale, i can play it in 3rds, i can play the 1-3-5 or 1-3-5-7 arpeggios so easily without having to think about it because i know the relative distances. even if i don't know the actual notes.
but take saxophone. let's say i wanted to play a 1-3-5-7 arpeggio in G major (a common first scale for sax).
G is your index, middle, and pinky finger on your left hand
A is index and middle
B is index
C is just middle
D is all three left hand, all three right hand, plus left thumb
E is 3 left, index middle right (plus thumb)
F# is 3 left, middle right plus thumb
and G is 3 left plus thumb (left thumb is an octave key)
okay, so now you know that major scale. now the 1-3-5-7 arpeggio would be G, B, D, F# and then G.
see how confusing this is? NOW, what if you wanted to do the same thing except in the key of Bb? good luck because i'm not typing that all out again. i would have to think about it, figure it out, and write it down before playing it.
this is why you need to be able to read music on the fly (which i don't think i can do as easily anymore)
compare this with guitar. 1-3-5-7 arpeggio in G is the same as it is in Bb, just at a different starting point. |